Can You XConstruction
--
DanielWiechmann --
04 Feb 2008
Can You XConstruction
1. General
1.1. Label
Can you X Construction
1.2. Reasons for construction status
COMING UP
1.3. Examples
English:
(i) Can you close the window?
2. Language Information
2.1. Comments
no special variety.
2.2. Language
English
2.3. Variety
2.3.1. Regional
seems to be possible without regional restrictions
2.3.2. Social
no social variation for the general pattern
2.3.3. Register
no variation according to situation for the general pattern
2.3.4. Speech Community
no information
2.3.5. Genre
no particular genre
2.3.6. Style
Can/Could COMING UP
2.3.7. Language Contact
no information
2.4. Time Period
no information
2.5. Stage of Acquisition
no information
3. Form
3.1. Syntax
3.1.1. Comments
3.1.2. Internal
3.1.2.1. Valency
COMING UP
3.1.2.2. Constituency
COMING UP
3.1.3. External
3.1.3.1. Category
(category label)
3.1.3.2. Structural Position
COMING UP
3.2. Morphology
3.2.1. Comments
COMING UP
3.2.2. Internal
3.2.2.1. Morphological Properties of Elements
COMING UP
3.2.3. External
3.2.3.1. Morphological Properties of Construction
COMING UP
4. Meaning
4.1. Semantics
4.1.1. Comments
4.1.2. Internal
4.1.2.1. Frame
(frame evoked)
4.1.2.1.1. Event
(event type)
4.1.2.1.2. Participants
(description of the participants, e.g. as 'selection restrictions')
4.1.2.2. Truth-Conditional Stuff
(information on the truthconditional properties of the construction)
4.1.2.2.1. Negation
(peculiar behaviours with respect to negation)
4.1.2.2.2. Scope
(description of the scope of the construction)
4.1.3. External
4.1.3.1. Semantic Class
(semantic category)
4.1.3.2. Relation to Construction-External Semantic Elements
4.1.3.3. Truth Relations
4.1.3.3.1. Semantic Presuppositions
(semantic presupposition)
4.1.3.3.2. Semantic Entailments
(semantic entailments)
4.2. Pragmatics
4.2.1. Comments
(general pragmatic behaviour)
4.2.2. Internal
(internal pragmatic properties)
4.2.3. External
4.2.3.1. Indexical Properties
4.2.3.1.1. Deixis
4.2.3.1.2. Intertextuality
4.2.3.2. Interpersonal Function (Politeness, Other-Self, etc.)
4.2.3.3. Speaker attitude
(modality, epistemic, emotion)
4.2.3.4. Speech Act Force
4.2.3.5. Rhetorical Function
4.2.3.6. Style
4.2.3.7. Pragmatic Presuppositions / Implicature
4.3. Discourse Properties
4.3.1. Internal
4.3.1.1. Turn Constructional Status
4.3.1.2. Within-Turn Position
4.3.2.External
4.3.2.1. Sequential Context
4.3.2.2. Position in Text- and Dialogue-Structure
4.3.2.3. Sequence Type
4.4. Information Structure
4.4.1. Intern
4.4.1.1. Topic - Comment
4.4.1.2. Focus
4.4.2. Extern
4.4.2.1. Signaled Information Status (Given - New - Brandnew - etc.)
4.4.2.2. Information Status Requirements
4.5. Data
4.5.1. Introspection
both corpus and introspection
4.5.2. Authentic data
4.5.2.1. Source data properties:
http://www.taz.de
4.5.2.2. Quantitative specifications
4.5.2.3. Source material size/length
4.5.2.4. Number of considered tokens
4.5.2.5. Sampling
4.5.2.6. Search string
4.5.2.7. Sample rate
4.5.2.8. Number of retrieved hits
4.5.2.9. Cleaning procedures
4.6. Literature
Stefanowitsch, Anatol. (2003). A construction-based approach to indirect speech acts. In Klaus-Uwe Panther and Linda Thornburg (eds), Metonymy and Pragmatic Inferencing, 105-126. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins
COMING UP
5. Relations to other constructions
5.1. Subtypes
5.1.1. Diachronic
5.1.2. Synchronic
5.2. Supertypes
5.2.1. Diachronic
5.2.2. Synchronic
5.3. Paradigmatic Relations
6. Description
6.1. Author
Daniel Wiechmann (should be filled in automatically)
6.2. Date
(date of last editing) should be filled in automatically