AnaphoraResolution

[Sturt03]
Patrick Sturt. The time-course of the application of binding constraints in reference resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 48(3):542--562, 2003. [ .pdf ]
Abstract: We report two experiments which examined the role of binding theory in on-line sentence processing. Participants' eye movements were recorded while they read short texts which included anaphoric references with reflexive anaphors (himself or herself). In each of the experiments, two characters were introduced into the discourse before the anaphor, and only one of these characters was a grammatical antecedent for the anaphor in terms of binding theory. Both experiments showed that Principle A of the binding theory operates at the very earliest stages of processing; early eyemovement measures showed evidence of processing diffculty when the gender of the reflexive anaphor mismatched the stereotypical gender of the grammatical antecedent. However, the gender of the ungrammatical antecedent had no effect on early processing, although it affected processing during later stages in Experiment 1. An additional experiment showed that the gender of the ungrammatical antecedent also affected the likelihood of participants settling on an ungrammatical final interpretation. The results are interpreted in relation to the notions of bonding and resolution in reference processing.
[IidaEtal03]
Ryu Iida, Kentaro Inui, Hiroya Takamura, and Yuji Matsumoto. Incorporating contextual cues in trainable models for coreference resolution. In Robert Dale, Kees van Dempter, and Ruslan Mitkov, editors, Proceedings of the EACL-03 Workshop on the Computational Treatment of Anaphora, Budapest, 2003.
Abstract: We propose a method that incorporates various novel contextual cues into a machine learning for resolving coreference. Distinct characteristics of our model are (i) incorporating more linguistic features capturing contextual information that is more sophisticated than what is offered in Centering Theory, and (ii) a tournament model for selecting a referent. Our experiments show that this model significantly outperforms earlier machine learning approaches, such as Soon et al. (2001).
[DaleEtal03]
Robert Dale, Kees van Dempter, and Ruslan Mitkov, editors. Proceedings of the EACL-03 Workshop on the Computational Treatment of Anaphora, Budapest, 2003.
[NgCardie02a]
Vincent Ng and Claire Cardie. Identifying anaphoric and non-anaphoric noun phrases to improve coreference resolution. In COLING 2002, 2002.
[NgCardie02]
Vincent Ng and Claire Cardie. Improving machine learning approaches to coreference resolution. In 40th Annual Meeting of the Asssociation for Computational Linguistics, 2002.
Abstract: We present a noun phrase coreference system that extends the work of Soon et al. (2001) and, to our knowledge, produces the best results to date on the MUC-6 and MUC-7 coreference resolution data sets -- F-measures of 70.4 and 63.4, respectively. Improvements arise from two sources: extra-linguistic changes to the learning framework and a large-scale expansion of the feature set to include more sophisticated linguistic knowledge.
[Mitkov02]
Ruslan Mitkov. Anaphora Resolution. Longman, Harlow, UK, 2002.
[SoonEtal01]
Wee Meng Soon, Hwee Tou Ng, and Daniel Chung Yong Lim. A machine learning approach to coreference resolution of noun phrases. Computational Linguistics, 27(4):521--544, 2001.
Abstract: In this paper, we present a learning approach to coreference resolution of noun phrases in unrestricted text. The approach learns from a small, annotated corpus and the task includes resolving not just a certain type of noun phrase (e.g., pronouns) but rather general noun phrases. It also does not restrict the entity types of the noun phrases; that is, coreference is assigned whether they are of "organization," "person," or other types. We evaluate our approach on common data sets (namely, the MUC-6 and MUC-7 coreference corpora) and obtain encouraging results, indicating that on the general noun phrase coreference task, the learning approach holds promise and achieves accuracy comparable to that of nonlearning approaches. Our system is the first learning-based system that offers performance comparable to that of state-of-the-art nonlearning systems on these data sets.
[KellerAsudeh01]
Frank Keller and Ash Asudeh. Constraints on linguistic coreference: Structural vs. pragmatic factors. In Johanna D. Moore and Keith Stenning, editors, Proceedings of the 23rd. Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pages 483--488, Mahwah, NJ, 2001. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [ .pdf ]
Abstract: Binding theory is the component of grammar that regulates the interpretation of noun phrases. Certain syntactic configurations involving picture noun phrases (PNPs) are problematic for the standard formulation of binding theory, which has prompted competing proposals for revisions of the theory. Some authors have proposed an account based on structural constraints, while others have argued that anaphors in PNPs are exempt from binding theory, but subject to pragmatic restrictions. In this paper, we present an experimental study that aims to resolve this dispute. The results show that structural factors govern the binding possibilities in PNPs, while pragmatic factors play only a limited role. However, the structural factors identified differ from the ones standardly assumed.
[VieiraPoesio00]
Renata Vieira and Massimo Poesio. An empirically based system for processing definite descriptions. Computational Linguistics, 26(4):539--593, 2000. [ .pdf ]
Abstract: We present an implemented system for processing definite descriptions in arbitrary domains. The design of the system is based on the results of a corpus analysis previously reported, which highlighted the prevalence of discourse-new descriptions in newspaper corpora. The annotated corpus was used to extensively evaluate the proposed techniques for matching definite descriptions with their antecedents, discourse segmentation, recognizing discourse-new descriptions, and suggesting anchors for bridging descriptions.
[Huang00]
Yan Huang. Anaphora: A cross-linguistic study. Oxford Studies in Typology and Linguistic Theory, 2000.
[Mitkov99]
Ruslan Mitkov. Anaphora resolution: the state of the art, 1999. Working paper (Based on the COLING'98/ACL'98 tutorial on anaphora resolution). [ .ps.gz ]
[Mitkov98]
Ruslan Mitkov. Robust pronoun resolution with limited knowledge. In Proceedings 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, 36th Annual Meeting of the ACL, Coling-ACL '98, pages 869--865, Montreal, Canada, 1998.
[Mitkov98a]
Ruslan Mitkov. Robust pronoun resolution with limited knowledge. In In Proceedings of the 18.th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING'98)/ACL'98 Conference, pages 869--875, Montreal, Canada, 1998. [ .ps.gz ]

Total: 13

Sources

 
This site is powered by FoswikiCopyright © by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding Foswiki? Send feedback